Understanding Legal Standing

Understanding Legal Standing

I watched much of Mike Lindell’s Thanks-a-Thon over the Thanksgiving holiday weekend. It was a fascinating compilation of the vast amounts of evidence that has been collected – from Antrim County, Michigan, to Maricopa County, Arizona, and in all parts of these united States.

The corporate media giants have here-to-for misconstrued, flat-out lied about and have kept this evidentiary information hidden from the majority of decision-makers in this country (the decision makers who are being kept in the dark are commonly referred to as We the People).

It is now up to We the People to share the Thanks-a-Thon information as far and as wide as possible.

The most important concepts for us to try to understand at this point are the two major bases for this complaint and the reasons our States have “standing.

There seems to be a prevailing default position that the courts across this country cite when they seemingly cower in fear of even looking at a case … that is the so-called "lack of standing" argument, which is preposterous on the face of it.

First, Attorney Kurt Olsen stated that the constitution is a compact among States - every State has a right to pursue an election under the 12th amendment for President and Vice-President and the denial of that right is standing.

The portions of the 12th Amendment to the US Constitution that I believe Atty Olsen was referring to is excerpted as follows: The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President … The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; ...

Every single State in these united States has the right (the standing) to be assured that every other State’s electoral college voters were properly seated because their outcome-determining votes do in fact affect all other States.

The second basis for standing that Attorney Kurt Olsen provided was that after the Georgia run-off election, the US Senate was split equally (50-50) which made the Vice President of the United States (who is the President of the US Senate) the tie breaking vote – if the election of the President and the Vice President was illegal and not valid, having an illegal Vice President casting deciding votes on issues that affect all States injures all States because their votes are disenfranchised.

This second basis for standing requires no further explanation.

At this point, in my humble opinion, it should be clear to all nine supreme court justices, as well as to all public functionaries and to the ultimate decision-making body called We the People why it is critical that the facts contained in this lawsuit be disseminated and distributed throughout the land and a concrete decision be agreed upon that enough factual evidence exists to not only decertify the November 2020 election, but to put many people responsible for these egregious acts behind bars to await the customary penalty for treason.



Back to blog

Leave a comment